09.05.2008 NO PLAYBOY FOR LINDSAY

Page Six says that Lindsay Lohan turned down almost $701,000 to pose naked for the January issue of Playboy.

The Sapphic-leaning star has turned down a $700,000 offer to do an eight-page topless spread in Playboy's 55th-anniversary issue this January. "If there's nudity, then the answer's no . . . She's not going down the [New York] magazine road again," Lohan's rep told Playboy's creative consultant.

Last time Lindsay did this, she said later that she didn’t know it was for a magazine or that the pics would be so revealing.  I’m not sure what she thought topless pictures were gonna look like, but they look very much like topless pictures.  So Playboy should have just gone to the easily befuddled Lindsay and made up some story to get her naked.  Like look at the tag on her shirt and then say you heard cotton was made of poison.  Get that shirt off and lets take some pictures so we can see if you have a reaction later.


(70) Comments

  1. Brandon103 09/05/2008 12:04

    yeah!!! new thread!

  2. scum 09/05/2008 12:04

    She will eat tainted clam but wont pose nude? Bitch.

  3. Brandon103 09/05/2008 12:04

    but shiit!! it's about lilo!!

  4. Danimal 09/05/2008 12:05

    at this point she's too dumpy for it anyway

  5. Big Smelly Dirt Cock 09/05/2008 12:05

    But she didn't rule out hardcore ass-fucking videos either right?  Awesome.

  6. Brandon103 09/05/2008 12:05

    gross - i don't know how Brèndo can look at the last picture and still find this bitch attractive 

  7. Otis Fenchlark 09/05/2008 12:06

    In related news, Samantha Ronson has accepted a $75 offer to pose for Playgirl.

  8. Slaappy got fingerbanged 09/05/2008 12:07

    PLAYBOY = Uninteresting since pre internet

  9. MaxwellDemon 09/05/2008 12:09

    Only 700K? I thought $1M was the standard offer. Or maybe that's just the Indecent Proposal standard.

  10. dirtydiane 09/05/2008 12:12

    Frecklelicious.

  11. mom2ross 09/05/2008 12:13

    It was $1,000,000 when Chris Elliot offered it to Woody Harrelson, wasn't it, Maxwell?  Never mind, that was a dream sequence…

  12. Paleomiz 09/05/2008 12:13

    PLAYBOY = Uninteresting since pre internet

    And since the internet, who would even buy Playboy when in a fraction of a second you can get free downloads of trannie midgets fucking donkeys in a tub full of Jello?

  13. mom2ross 09/05/2008 12:13

    See what happens when you all ask for boobs?  Bet you'll think twice next time, huh?

  14. The Fried Man 09/05/2008 12:14

    Brendan, you motor boatin' son of a bitch, you.  

  15. leftnutofjesus 09/05/2008 12:17

    In the last pic with the net,

    she looks like a freshly caught and deformed one-eyed mermaid that's having a facial stroke, but somehow grew a set of nice neighborhood titties.

     

  16. ham sandwich 09/05/2008 12:18

    Not wearing a bra will not help her "situation".

  17. roflbacon 09/05/2008 12:21

    Good.  I don't need another vomit-inducing photoshoot of this gingerdykebitchcuntcancerousscabwhore.

     

    Maybe she read my letterbomb and took it to heart.

  18. MG Admirer 09/05/2008 12:23

    And since the internet, who would even buy Playboy when in a fraction of a second you can get free downloads of trannie midgets fucking donkeys in a tub full of Jello?

     

    Doctress, please post link, thanks in advance

  19. Paleomiz 09/05/2008 12:27

    And since the internet, who would even buy Playboy when in a fraction of a second you can get free downloads of trannie midgets fucking donkeys in a tub full of Jello?

    Shouldn't you know how to find it, having been the fluffer and all?

  20. Paleomiz 09/05/2008 12:27

    And since the internet, who would even buy Playboy when in a fraction of a second you can get free downloads of trannie midgets fucking donkeys in a tub full of Jello?

    Shouldn't you know how to find it, having been the fluffer and all?

You must be logged in to post a comment.