Kim Cattrall has posed topless in an effort to somehow save some picture. None of this makes an ounce of sense, but she posed in a recreation of the painting "Diana and Actaeon" by the Italian Renaissance artist Titian. I can't stress enough how her recreation looks absolutely nothing like the original. Not in any way, even mildly or by sheer coincidence is there any parallel whatsoever. And somehow this is supposed to save the picture from being sold. The Mirror says…
The Sex and the City star stripped in a campaign to prevent a classic work by Titian being sold abroad.
British-born Kim, 52, posed in a photo version of the painting, Diana and Actaeon, to raise awareness.
The original canvas is one of two being sold for £100million by the Duke of Sutherland. He has given the National Galleries until December 31 to raise half the money to buy it from him and keep it for the nation.
Top British artists have petitioned Downing Street to save the painting. The photo including Kim - by artist Tom Hunter - will be featured tonight on BBC2's Culture Show.
Kim said viewing the original painting is "like being in the presence of genius". She added: "It would be a tragedy if it were not on public view."
This is actually kind of amazing. Kim’s tits are absolutely awful, they’re terrible terrible tits, and yet the power of tits is so mighty, they may even save this priceless work of art. But probably not. If all it took to save things was to look at pictures of tits, I could have brought the dinosaurs back before I even turned 16.
Ahhh, tits.
Although I usually like much bigger ones. Oh well. Flat tits are better than looking at no tits.
Tits tits tits.
"Kim’s tits are absolutely awful, they’re terrible terrible tits"
maybe so, maybe no…but the things she has to teach, I am wanting to learn…
Put some fucking clothes on you old bag.
The_Humanix_Rom//: the act of fucking the one with large breasts. To spurt into the firmament of stars… a gilt edged hole…
I'd spelunk my dick in Kim Catrall any day, any hour. Fuck all you haters.
The bitch is like 54…let's cut her and her sagging boobs a break.
DB…no hating here…in fact, she's number 2 on my list of unattainable women that I'd love to attain…
Exactly, I think she looks phenomenal for her age. Any one of us men would be lucky as fuck if our wives will look half as good as Kim does at her age.
Shhh… don't tell my mom that I looked at boobs.
The chick with the stupid hair all the way to the left in pic #1 does have some wonderful funbags on her…..But then i pan to Kim and my cock just ran out of my office screaming….
The one on the right does anal. You can tell.
PICTURED ABOVE: Sinead O'Connor, Britney Spears, Kim Catrall, and Christina Ricci.
Casting for a new season of Surreal Life?
://The_act_of_an_older_woman_bearing_her_fruits_//… The HumanixRom of our tragedy..// _enter_command:_: <The vision of these cerebral fruits stimulates the ultra=machinery tragedyROM creature of a chemical ReBirth>
_enter_command:_:// The_reptilianHUB_of_//vile…//SEXPLAY_is_the_cruel_abolition_of_the <HyperReal//…cytoplasmic scanner> - The/HUMAN/body's/cold/pill/of/a/hyperbaric/code…//… enough to make you scream at our NON-RESETTABLE Murder_Gimmack//soul…gasm.
If I were the Duke of Sutherland and I saw her tits, I'd sell the painting out of spite
Keyser, every chick does anal….you just have to ignore the initial screams
From left to right….
Brittney spears in about 9 years
Some tan-aholic wench
Some 62 year old lady with a saggy egg
Dude…..Put your figner over that chicks head and tell me that's not a Tranny!! nuff said.
I fuck her little ass with a xx-large dildo and make her squirt at such at force that it will paint the walls.
This may be the least excited I have ever been looking at 4 naked chicks.
That being said, I'll take the one on the right.
Pap, what is your avatar? A man covered in grass riding on the subway, while a lovely brunette woman catches his gaze…?