04.19.2007 JESSICA ALBA IS A GOOD DRESSER

Jessica Alba was caught yesterday on the set of a Revlon commercial wearing a see thru dress.  Unfortunately the pictures aren’t nearly as exciting as the first sentence may imply.  In fact they're pretty disappointing.  But they do raise the question: does Revlon really want their make-up spokesman to look like this.  You could just throw makeup at her and she'd look better.  Not even make-up, you could throw bees at her and she'd look better.


(91) Comments

  1. Juan 04/19/2007 14:40

    Why the hell is she wearing white panties with a black dress? Hell, why the hell is she wearing PANTIES at all?

  2. Juan 04/19/2007 14:40

    I like the word Hell, in case you cant tell.

  3. TheButterThief 04/19/2007 14:41

    Cheers, Juan. I’ll go you one better: why is she wearing a Goddamn dress? It should be a class I felony for this broad to cover up her body.

  4. Juan 04/19/2007 14:41

    the banner pic is the best. buttlicious.

  5. Jim 04/19/2007 14:41

    She’s fantastic.

  6. Willie Beamin 04/19/2007 14:44

    Yeah and those are like granny panties…WTF Jessica

  7. Juan 04/19/2007 14:48

    sadly, based on Brend*on’s post on 17 April, it appears Jessica is only into K-9 sex. At least that’s the impression I got from a cursory glance at the photos. Didnt read the story. Couldnt be bothered. Too busy. And too important.

  8. Joseph 04/19/2007 14:51

    That’s enough to make me smile :) What’s with the avatars on the comments?

  9. Angela 04/19/2007 14:52

    Yeah, Juan, she prefers dogs. Something about peanut butter I think.

  10. Willie Beamin 04/19/2007 15:00

    I have some peanut butter

  11. LoRider 04/19/2007 15:01

    Jessica has no friends - if she did, one of them would’ve said “Baby, don’t wear that” Ride Lo

  12. monosylabik 04/19/2007 15:01

    i wonder what she would look like with a beard full of bees…or maybe a dog beard?

  13. HoneySuckle 04/19/2007 15:03

    I don’t really have a comment….just wanted to try out the hot new comment section

  14. Shaft 04/19/2007 15:03

    or maybe, shes filming a commercial and you wouldnt see a baby under that dress if they film it the right way

  15. Lyqueriax 04/19/2007 15:03

    FIRST

  16. Kip Winger 04/19/2007 15:07

    So you take a naturally stunning young lady and plaster your makeup on her to make her look like a clown, and then use that in your advertisements? That isn’t a good idea unless you are trying to say “Look how awful our makeup can make even Jessica Alba look!” You’d think they would take someone below average and boring like Jessica Simpson, and try to make her up to look good, and then brag about how the only reason anyone ever thought she was hot was because she has horrible fake tits, and is made up by professional make up artists every time she showed her face in public, and was heavily photoshopped in every picture in every magazine she was ever in. Well actually that wouldn’t be bragging about their makeup as much as just finally telling the truth.

  17. God 04/19/2007 15:07

    suck me off you flaming h0m0 fuckz

  18. JoeBlow 04/19/2007 15:09

    Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!! Its the attack of Janet Jackson’s nipple. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I wonder if I can have spaces inbetween sentence now? As for the story though. No thong? White grandma panties? Someone smack this ho quick.

  19. Cry me a river 04/19/2007 15:10

    What do 40 year old virgins know about getting sucked off?

  20. Angel Eyes Van Cleef 04/19/2007 15:11

    Yikes Revlon. Who’s directing the ad? James Whale? They missed a trick by not including the dog. That could be a whole new range for them: Make-up for Dogs.

You must be logged in to post a comment.