Yesterday of course bored indifference swept the nation with the news that Kim Catrall had posed topless for a recreation of "Diana and Actaeon", by the Italian Renaissance artist Titian. And BBC2 was set to air the story of the photograph last night on the "Culture Show". Many hoped it was an idle threat, but, for whatever reason, they really did it. So if you wanted to see screencaps of a topless old lady, well then you’re today’s Big Winner. The most surprising part was when they showed the photographer holding up his picture next to a picture of "Diana and Actaeon". Keep in mind this was supposed to be a recreation. So it begs the question, what on earth made him think he was finished?
(picture source = Splash)
why again?
please god, why!?
Who the hell gives a shit enough to watch TV show about a picture of a painting?
Fucking ZZZzzzzz
Hey dude, Have you forgotten Thanksgiving is tomorrow? Some of us would like to have an appetite for the occasion
Look, I stood up for this old bag once. I am not doing it again for the second time in two days.
Why would I look at this skank ass ho naked? She is disgusting with her clothes on.
I think Kim is still HOT, I have loved her ever since the movie manequin back in the 1980's.
How come there is not an uncensored version of the main picture?
cought it up Tyler
She looks like a shit I took after a night of heavy drinking and a morning of leftover Taco Bell.
Did they just go to the nearest dike bar and say, "Who wants to get naked with Kim Cattrall?"
Now i see it!!! This second post did it. Yes i now see how hott she is DB It jsut had to be forced into my brain for the last 24 hours. lol……she looks like she is taking a shit.
So were the other chicks just dirty vagrants they found down the street or what? Looks like it.
that dyke on the left end kinda hurts my feelings. and i'm extra sensitive today.
Thems is some nasty, NASTY titties.
I like how the photographer is comparing his photo to the painting, yet it still looks nothing like the painting.
::camera cuts to cross-eyed photographer::
"Yes, perfect!"
I'd shag the lot of them.
….AND I'd skull-fuck the skull in the background.
It's rare to be unattracted to 5 naked women at the same time. I guess this means I'm maturing.
(.) (.)
*
Huh, huh.
i thought it meant you were watching the golden girls, meph jeff?
@dirtydiane1 - Never did I ever catch the all-nude Golden Girls episode. Must nave been during sweeps week.
Look, DB. It's your woman. Again.
As one of the 2 resident foot guys (what's up, ohm?) I say that this pic at least gives me a chance to critique 8 different foot poses. So, I'll go from L to R. 1. Can't see the toes, too damn pale. 2. Again, pale; decent arch action; the stupid pillow camouflages the toes. 3. Perfect. Nailed it. I'd do bad things with/to that foot. 4. The angle makes this foot look more like a tan vampire's than the person that owns #3's. No likey. 5. Not real bad, but does kind of resemble a dude's. 6. Hate this pose. That kind of toe spread is just begging to make toes look wonky, uneven, etc.. 7. Although this bend shows great flexibility, which is a good thing, again you hide the damn toes. 8. All I really see is that big ball of your foot, which looks kind of manly like Catrall's.
There you have it. Carry on.
it was the x-tra special edition, meph. ;)
i forgot it was called the culture show-basically cos it was a bag of SHITE