Lea Michele, Dianna Agron and some dude whose name I didn’t bother to learn from ‘Glee’ are on the cover of the GQ in a sexy new photo shoot, and since people love complaining about anything good, people are complaining about this. Specifically they say that, because ‘Glee’ takes place in a high school, these pictures are practically child pornography.
The Parents Television Council denounced the makers of the TV show “Glee” for a hyper-sexualized GQ photo shoot that will be featured in the November issue.
“It is disturbing that GQ, which is explicitly written for adult men, is sexualizing the actresses who play high school-aged characters on ‘Glee’ in this way. It borders on pedophilia. Sadly, this is just the latest example of the overt sexualization of young girls in entertainment.”
Lea and Dianna are both 24, and the guy (identity unknown) is 28, so it might be an exaggeration to say this “borders on pedophilia.” If the producers were some kind of perverts, I would have seen them at our meetings.
Besides, these pictures aren’t even that sexual. That’s why I did a real quick photoshop of the cover and erased that dork in the middle. Now it’s sort of like Lea and Dianna are about to kiss or something. Here’s one where it looks like Lea is my secret lover and sent me a picture of her ass. After that are a bunch of pictures of what Dianna would look like if she had 34F breasts and really liked this website. ‘Glee’ kicks ass!



















I guess I understand why some people watch this show…
“It is disturbing that GQ, which is explicitly written for adult GAY men, is sexualizing the actresses who play high …….”
The PTC had a bit of a typo……
This is a lot better than Brandy. I’m just saying.
Picture #6 does remind me of Catholic High School…..
I’m watt power and I approve of these pictures
So somebody sent in new pics, and the next post took hours. Was somebody spanking the monkey?
http://www.wwtdd.com/enlargedimage/?back_to=/2010/10/lea-michelle-and-the-producers-of-glee-heart-pedophiles/lea_michelle_glee_gq_5/&postid=682192
What a shit photoshop. You left a hairy arm in there.
No adams, he was photoshopping poorly.
Lea’s facial expression on the cover is not satisfactory.
The B&W photo of the brunette pulling her panties down looks fake as religion.
To the chick who hid her nipple yet also didn’t show her face: why not show tour tits? Your face isn’t shown! Your just some random whore onthe net! Just show them.
Z’s “old busters”was higher quality and probably took less time.
i tried out for glee, but they said “fuck off corky.” what duz that mean?
I with Obs on this…“It is disturbing that GQ, which is explicitly written for adult men, is sexualizing the actresses who play high school-aged characters on ‘Glee’ in this way. It borders on pedophilia. Sadly, this is just the latest example of the overt sexualization of young girls in entertainment.” Gay men read GQ which is why it’s known as GayQueers and gays watch GLEE.
I bet her clam smells like cherry chapstick
I may start watching the show now- they know how to get my interest.
Rokan- nice song reference and perfect mental image.
Gay queers is a double negative! They are straight!
*hugs glee season 1 dvds*
The brunette has a manly face, I smell tranny.
Next week is the Halloween episode. They’re going to be singing Rocky Horror songs. Since I’ve never seen that movie I don’t know how much I’ll enjoy it… oh well…
Anybody else hear an annoying droning noise?